Evaluation 1043 by Anon (session_user_id: 65dc230d5b3b310ab3621213604e0bd320ea9216)
What is your overall decision about this article?
Are the data stations well quality-controlled?
The quality of the data vary quite a lot per set, however, overall the density of the data seems sufficient to draw preliminary conclusions.
Are the selection criteria for the stations well explained? Or, if this project does not have to do with time series met. stations, are the premises of the project well thought out and explained? Is it a topic of special interest? (It doesn't have to be, but if it is, say so).
The selection criteria are relatively well explained, though there might be some ambiguity of "random" being really random or not (since many stations would not have enough data). The topic is very interesting, and can help to give pointers on how to improve the models.
Are the conclusions of the report quantitatively supported by the data?
Yes, the data was very good in quantity and quality.