Evaluation 438 by Anon (session_user_id: d9331c46996c27dee7aa99cd1f29e3b7f048e944)

What is your overall decision about this article?  
Are the conclusions of the report quantitatively supported by the data?  
Observation #1: Yes. Observation #2: No, RCP4.5 should be *less* hot than RCP8.5, so the conclusion drawn in the paper does not make sense.
Are the selection criteria for the stations well explained?   Or, if this project does not have to do with time series met. stations, are the premises of the project well thought out and explained?  Is it a topic of special interest?  (It doesn't have to be, but if it is, say so).  
Reasonably well-explained and reasonably interesting.
Are the data stations well quality-controlled?