Evaluation 624 by Anon (session_user_id: 889fe6b68c575007c3a0002cfea652b0c1e0aee5)

What is your overall decision about this article?  
Are the selection criteria for the stations well explained?   Or, if this project does not have to do with time series met. stations, are the premises of the project well thought out and explained?  Is it a topic of special interest?  (It doesn't have to be, but if it is, say so).  
The study could be interesting but lacks focus. Results are not averaged but presented for each station instead, therefore having a good chance to be biased. It would have been better to compare warming trends for of populated and mon populated areas, averaged iver many stations.
Are the conclusions of the report quantitatively supported by the data?  
Conclusion is not well supported by data.
Are the data stations well quality-controlled? 
No information given on period analysed