Evaluation 1334 by Anon (session_user_id: 5e3ac093358bc8f564af2b2090d62f4231fd359f)
What is your overall decision about this article?
Are the selection criteria for the stations well explained? Or, if this project does not have to do with time series met. stations, are the premises of the project well thought out and explained? Is it a topic of special interest? (It doesn't have to be, but if it is, say so).
The station data appear valid, and it was explained that they are from the Med. area, but not otherwise explained. Good analysis of the change in trendline starting 1970.
Are the conclusions of the report quantitatively supported by the data?
Looking at multiple models is a plus. Important topic, well discussed. Spelling and grammar need proofed.
Are the data stations well quality-controlled?
They appear to be, but not discussed in the text.