Upper Ocean Physics as Relevant to Ecosystem Dynamics:


a Tutorial












David Archer
Department of the Geophysical Sciences
5734 South Ellis Avenue
University of Chicago
Chicago, Ill 60637

Abstract

Oceanic control of the atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is the link between the studies of plankton ecology and climate change. Modeling ecosystem dynamics requires some understanding of physics and chemistry of the upper ocean. In addition, an understanding of the issues involved in predicting climate change can help focus ecological studies. This article is intended as a review of upper ocean physics and chemistry as relevant to ecosystem research, and a summary of climate-related issues to which ecosystem dynamics might in the future make a contribution.

Our picture of the carbon cycle in the upper ocean relies on ecosystem dynamics for an understanding of the efficiency of nutrient uptake and export of carbon in the form sinking carbon particles, and for the fraction of recycled and exported particulate carbon production. A fundamental variable appears to be the size distribution of phytoplankton. Also, ultimately, an understanding of the partitioning between calcitic and siliceous based ecosystems may be important to predicting the long-term ocean carbon cycle.

Ecosystem dynamics of the upper ocean are driven by the interplay between dynamics of the surface ocean mixed layer and the depth of light penetration. This interplay is illustrated by noting the effect of high-frequency fluctuations in mixed layer depth from a physical model (Archer, et al., 1993) on an ecosystem model developed at weathership station Papa in the subarctic Pacific ocean (Frost, 1987). Three families of surface ocean mixed layer model are available for use by plankton ecologists, and although the physical mechanisms by which mixing occurs differ among the model groups, all are in general successful at predicting the observed ocean mixed layer depth. This paper explores behavioral distinctions between the three types of models, and summarizes previously published comparisons of the generality, accuracy, and computational requirements of the three models. Nutrients are supplied to the euphotic zone by the exchange of water between nutrient-depleted surface waters and nutrient-rich deeper waters. Current understanding of this process is still problematic, with rates of mixing required to balance nutrient uptake estimates higher than values predicted based on turbulence studies. Evidence is reviewed that episodic mixing, driven by frontal and mesocale motions, may be responsible for a significant fraction of vertical nutrient transport.

Key Words: Ocean carbon cycle, CO2

1. The Role of Plankton Ecology in Climate Change Research

The factors that control the population dynamics of the upper ocean are only poorly understood, and yet they are of some significance to socially crucial issues of climate change. In particular, biological pumping of carbon to the deep ocean maintains a lower concentration of the greenhouse gas CO2 in the atmosphere than would exist above a "dead" ocean. Certain very specific changes in the biological pump could drive large changes in atmsospheric CO2, in particular changes in nutrient utilization efficience in the high latitude oceans (Sarmiento and Toggweiler, 1984, Knox and McElroy, 1984, Siegenthaler and Wenk, 1984), or changes in the balance between calcitic and siliceous communities (Archer and Maier-Reimer, 1994). The size distribution of phytoplankton appears to be a major controller of recycling efficiency and carbon export from the surface ocean. At the same time, ocean ecologists must take care to avoid making excessive claims about the ability of biological processes to sequester fossil fuel CO2 (Broecker, 1991).

1.1. The Biological Pump and Seawater Carbonate Chemistry

Biological production in the surface ocean produces particles which sink into deeper waters, where they for the most part redissolve. This process (called the "biological pump") maintains lower concentrations of carbon and nutrients in the surface ocean than within the thermocline waters below. Removal of dissolved CO2 to form organic matter lowers the steady-state sea surface pCO2 relative to an abiotic ocean. Less important quantitatively is the removal of dissolved CO3= to form solid CaCO3 (the minerals calcite and aragonite), which tends to increase pCO2.

1.1.1. A Summary of Carbonate Buffer System Chemistry

The counter-intuitive inverse behavior between CO2 and CO3= is the result of the carbonate buffer system in seawater, which can be summarized as follows. Atmospheric CO2 dissolves in seawater and is hydrated to form carbonic acid, H2CO3. Carbonic acid is divalent; that is, it can undergo two de-protonation reactions to form bicarbonate (HCO3-), and carbonate (CO3=). The co-existence of these species in seawater creates a chemical buffer system, regulating the pH and the pCO2 of the oceans. Most of the inorganic carbon in the ocean exists as bicarbonate (~88%), with the concentrations of carbonate ion and CO2 comprising about 11% and 1%, respectively. A standard text for this topic is (Stumm and Morgan, 1981).

1.1.2. Aqueous Chemistry

The hydration reaction of CO2 to form H2CO3 is described by the following equilibrium system:

where K is a thermodynamic equilibrium constant. [Note: the activity of a solute represents the apparent concentration, which approaches the actual concentration near the limit of infinite dilution. Activity is denoted by braces (e.g., {CO2}), whereas concentrations are indicated by brackets (as [CO2]). A thermodynamic equilibrium constant is defined in terms of species activities, as above.]

Analytical determination of the relative activities of H2CO3 and CO2 is difficult, so it is convenient to group the two species together using the notation:

H2CO3* = H2CO3 + CO2. (2)

Carbonic acid undergoes de-protonation to form bicarbonate and carbonate ion. The equilibrium expression for the first pH reaction is expressed using the H2CO3* notation (this is called a composite equilibrium expression):

The second dissociation reaction is described by

HCO3- = H+ + CO3=,

K2 = F({H+}{CO3=},{HCO3-}). (4)

For convenience, apparent equilibrium constants, denoted by primes, can be defined in terms of concentrations of the carbonate species, rather than activities, as

Numerous authors have published values for K'1 and K'2, (Hansson, 1973, Mehrbach, et al., 1973, Dickson and Millero, 1987, Roy, et al., 1993) and the selection of the best pair is still a matter for research and debate (Millero, et al., 1993, Takahashi, et al., 1994). One set of expressions for K'1 and K'2 is given in the box.

The interaction between the carbonate species in seawater leads to the aforementioned counter-intuitive inverse behavior between CO2 and CO3=. When carbonate ion is removed from solution (such as by formation of solid CaCO3), bicarbonate ion undergoes a disproportionation reaction (until the equilibrium expressions (21) are satisfied):

The net result of this transaction is to increase the pCO2 of the water parcel as CO3= is removed. (Contrast this with the simple-minded expectation that removal of a carbon species (CO3=) should reduce the concentrations of all other carbon species, the "falling tide lowers all boats" scenario). Natural variations in seawater pH cause the relative concentrations of CO2 and CO3= to vary inversely with each other, like the seats on a teeter-totter, while the relative changes in the concentration of HCO3- are much smaller.

The carbonate buffer system as written above has two degrees of freedom; that is, two measurements are required to specify the system entirely. The "alkalinity" of a sample is defined as the amount of acid required to neutralize all of the weak bases in the solution (primarily bicarbonate and carbonate ion), and can be measured by pH titration (see (Stumm and Morgan, 1981)). Other practical measurements include the concentration of [[Sigma]]CO2 [defined as CO2 + HCO3- + CO3=: measurement technique by (Johnson et al., 1985), and the pCO2 (Takahashi, et al., 1982), and pH (Clayton and Byrne, 1993). Measuring pCO2 directly is the most reliable way of determining air-sea pCO2 differences in the field. However, for modeling CO2 in the ocean, pCO2 should be calculated from the alkalinity and [[Sigma]]CO2, since these are conservative to mixing. A simple algorithm for calculating pCO2 from alk and [[Sigma]]CO2 is given in the box.

1.1.3. Gas Equilibrium Chemistry

The equilibrium partitioning of CO2 between atmospheric and dissolved states is described by Henry's law:

where K'[[Eta]] is called the Henry's law constant. The inverse of the Henry's law constant is referred to as K'0. The pCO2, or "partial pressure" of CO2, is defined as the gas pressure exerted by CO2 in the head space above a water sample at equilibrium. Seawater that is not in gas-exchange equilibrium with the atmosphere will have a pCO2 that is different from the atmospheric value.

The Henry's law coefficient, K'H, varies strongly with temperature, tending to higher pCO2 at higher temperature. The [CO2]aq is also affected by temperature dependence of K'1 and K'2 (for a full treatment of these effects, see (Broecker and Peng, 1982), page 150). The net temperature dependence of seawater pCO2 is an increase by about 4.23% per degree Celsius (Takahashi, et al., 1993).

The pCO2 of sea water is buffered by the carbonate system, relative to a non-pH active gas like O2. This is because a change in pCO2 must be accompanied by changes in the concentrations of bicarbonate and carbonate ions. At the normal pH of seawater, the carbonate buffer system provides an effective reservoir for CO2 that is roughly 10 times larger than the reservoir for an unbuffered gas like O2. Therefore, the equilibration time of seawater pCO2 is roughly 10 times slower than that for O2. The "buffering strength" of seawater is often expressed as the Revelle buffer factor ( ), which is defined as the ratio between the relative sensitivity of pCO2 and total CO2 to an incremental addition or removal of CO2 to a water parcel.

For example, the average value of in global ocean surface waters is about 10. Therefore, a 1% increase in TCO2, about 20 umol kg-1 in typical surface seawater with TCO2 = 2000 umol kg-1, will result in an increase in pCO2 of 10%, which corresponds to an increase in H2CO3* of approximately 2 umol kg-1. The numerical correspondence between the factor of 10 decrease in gas equilibration response time described in the last paragraph and the value of the Revelle buffer factor of approximately 10 is merely a confusing coincidence. Waters with a smaller value of the Revelle factor can take up more CO2. Global surface ocean waters range from 8 in low CO2 tropical surface waters to 12 in high CO2 polar waters, and in deep water containing high CO2 concentrations reach as high as 17 (Takahashi, et al., 1980, Takahashi, et al., 1993).

1.2. Nutrient Limitation and the High Nutrient Low Productivity (HNLP) Problem

Biological uptake of carbon is limited by the availability of dissolved macronutrients NO3 and PO4. The elemental composition of "generic marine organic matter" was estimated by (Redfield, 1934) to be C:N:P:O2 = 106:16:1:-138, and revised by (Takahashi, et al., 1985) to be 103:16:1:-172. In either case, the availability of nutrients provides a strong constraint on the ability of the biota to export carbon to the deep sea. Because of this limitation, the biological pump in a high CO2 climate should be to first order about as strong as it is today; that is, the biological pump is not likely to sequester fossil fuel CO2 (Broecker, 1991) unless there is some change either in nutrient availability (by either a change in circulation or by sources of anthropogenic nutrients (Owens, et al., 1992)) or in the efficiency of nutrient uptake by plankton under conditions of higher CO2 (Riebesell, et al., 1993). The biological pump could even be weakened under conditions of high UV radiation fluxes resulting from an ozone-depleted atmosphere if UV adversely affects phytoplankton (Holm-Hansen et al., 1993; Smith et al., 1992).

In many regions of the world's oceans (the North Pacific, the Southern Ocean, and the equatorial Pacific) surface production does not fully deplete the surface nutrients during the summer growing season. In these regions, higher efficiency of nutrient utilization (i.e. lower nutrient concentrations) could drive sea surface pCO2 to lower values. Simple box models of the ocean - atmosphere system have shown that the atmospheric pCO2 is particularly sensitive to nutrient concentration in the high-latitude oceans (Sarmiento and Toggweiler, 1984, Knox and McElroy, 1984, Siegenthaler and Wenk, 1984),. If nutrients in the high-latitude surface waters were completely utilized by primary production, then the pre-industrial atmospheric pCO2 could have been as low as 165 ppm; lower efficiency of nutrient use could have increased pCO2 to as high as 425 ppm (pre-industrial atmospheric pCO2 was 280 ppm). Obviously, understanding the factors limiting growth in these regions, and predicting how they might respond to changing climate, is crucial to global CO2 modeling. Unfortunately, the limitation of phytoplankton growth is still a subject of research and debate.

One hypothesis is that the rate of primary production is limited by grazing by microzooplankton (Evans and Parslow, 1985, Frost, 1987, Fenchel, 1988). Microzooplankton have short reproductive cycles, and so can respond quickly to variations in primary production, in contrast to macrozooplankton, which have annual reproductive cycles. In the North Atlantic, where the spring bloom depletes the surface nutrients, it could be that the phytoplankton escape predation in the spring because of the deeper wintertime mixed layer (which depletes microzooplankton stocks to low levels (Frost, 1987)).

Another hypothesis involves the micronutrient iron, which may be limiting the primary production rate in some regions (Martin and Gordon, 1988, Martin and Fitzwater, 1988). Iron is thought to be used by phytoplankton in the enzymatic system for conversion of nitrate to ammonia; thus, a limitation of iron would inhibit new (nitrate-based) growth (Reuter and Ades, 1987, Morel, et al., 1991). Growth experiments using phytoplankton samples from the North Pacific were performed both with and without the addition of trace quantities of iron, and in most cases, the iron-added system showed enhanced phytoplankton growth rates relative to the low-Fe blank. Iron is supplied to the surface ocean by atmospheric flux of continental dust (Martin and Gordon, 1988), and regions of low nutrient utilization tend to correspond to regions of low atmospheric particulate input.

Recent work in the subarctic Pacific (the Subarctic Pacific Ecosystem Research program) has generated what has become known as the "SUPER synthesis" of these two hypotheses (Miller, et al., 1991). The growth rates of small phytoplankton appear to be unlimited by the availability of iron; that is, in in situ conditions, the doubling time of picophytoplankton approach physiological limits. However, production of picoplankton is limited by microbial grazing (Frost, 1987). When iron is added to these waters, after a few days nutrient uptake becomes dominated by large diatoms (Martin and Fitzwater, 1988), which are able to escape predation and bloom to the limit of available macronutrients. Thus, understanding the factors that control phytoplankton size appears to be of fundamental importance to a predictive understanding of the HNLP phenomenon. The efficiency of nutrient recycling must also be closely controlled by plankton size, with lower efficiency in systems dominated by larger grazers which produce quickly sinking fecal material, relative to the slow sinking velocity of microbial grazer fecal material. In addition, the potential for fish production is also fundamentally limited by the size characteristics of organisms at the bottom of the food chain (Ryther, 1969). Thus a predictive model for the size distribution of plankton as a function of environmental conditions would be extremely useful to prediction of air-sea carbon fluxes, nutrient utilization efficiency, new vs. recycled production, and fisheries yields.

1.3. Partitioning between Calcitic and Siliceous Ecosystems

Much of the interdisciplinary research between the fields of chemical and biological oceanography has concentrated on elucidating the factors that control the export of organic carbon to the deep sea. The next step must be the prediction of the functional groups of plankton. According to recent ideas about the carbon cycle in the ocean, the relative production rates of calcite and organic carbon can have a significant impact on the pH of the ocean, and the pCO2 of the atmosphere (Archer and Maier-Reimer, 1994). The proposed sensitivity of atmospheric pCO2 to calcite production led to the speculation that lower rates of calcite production, and higher rates of organic carbon production, during the last glacial maximum could account for lower pCO2 at that time. The balance between organic carbon and calcite could most easily be perturbed by shifting globally from calcitic (cocccolithophorid) production toward siliceous (diatom) based ecosystems. Factors that seem to control calcitic vs. siliceous ecosystems include temperature and dissolved silicate (Lisitzin, 1967). However, the details of this remain obscure, and prediction of the calcite / silicate ecosystem response of the upper ocean to changes in climate and ocean circulation are still beyond our grasp.

In addition to their alleged long-term effect on atmospheric CO2, the functional characteristics of phytoplankton production can also be significant to trace gases such as dimethyl sulfide, produced by coccolithophorids (Keller, et al., 1989). DMS production is one of the major terms in the natural sulfur cycle of the atmosphere, and has been implicated in the formation of cloud condensation nuclii (Charlson, et al., 1987).

2. The Role of Upper Ocean Physics in Plankton Ecosystem Modeling

Given that ecosystem dynamics have some part to play in understanding the carbon system of the upper ocean, we now make that case that the physics of mixing and light transmission appear to be primary drivers to the ecosystem dynamics of the upper ocean. The depth of surface momentum and buoyance flux driven mixing are predictable using available physical models, if meteorological conditions at the sea surface are know. However, the physics of mixing of nutrients across the stratification of the upper ocean are not well understood, and may currently present the ecosystem modeling community with some difficulty.

2.1. The Depth of Turbulent Mixing and Light Penetration

Phytoplankton photosynthesis is fundamentally controlled by the depth of turbulent mixing at the ocean surface coupled to the depth of sunlight penetration (the "euphotic zone"). The mixing time of waters in the mixed layer is fast relative to the timescale of plankton motility or population response. This means that when the mixed layer depth is deeper than some critical depth (called the "Sverdrup depth"), the rate of photosynthesis is light-limited. In spring, when thermal stratification drives shoaling of the mixed layer to shallower depths than the critical depth, the "spring bloom" is triggered (Sverdrup, 1953).

We illustrate the impact of mixed layer depth fluctuations on plankton population dynamics using a high-resolution one-dimensional coupled physics / ecosystem model of the mixed layer from weathership station Papa in the subarctic Pacific. The physical simulation was described by (Archer, et al., 1993), and ground-truthed to observations from the Canadian Weathership Program during the years 1973-1978. Model temperature structure is compared with observations in Fig. 1. The biological ecosystem model was developed as part of the Subarctic Pacific Ecosystem Research program (Frost, 1987, Miller, et al., 1991). The ecosystem model was run off-line; i.e. daily values of mixed layer depths and sea surface temperatures from the model, and sunlight intensity data from the weathership, were used to drive the ecosystem model. The parameters in the ecosystem model are appropriate to conditions of relatively low mixed-layer depth variability (Frost, 1987), and the response of the model most resembles data from Weathership Station Papa in the low-variability simulations.

Springtime warming drives shoaling of the mixed layer, which confines phytoplankton to the well-lit depths near the surface. Thus, fluctuations in mixed layer depth drive variability in the chlorophyll concentration of the model (Figure 2). When the model mixed layer depths are sub-sampled on longer time intervals, the variability of the chlorophyll concentration decreases (Figure 3). This example illustrates how upper ocean mixing dynamics can drive the behavior of the planktonic ecosystem, and motivates the coupling of ecosystem dynamics models with models of physical mixing. The next section explains the inputs required by mixing models, and reviews the existing literature on the physics of mixing in the upper ocean.

2.2. Air-Sea Fluxes

Mixed layer models, such as the one used above, are driven by air-sea fluxes of heat and fresh water (which determine the "flux" of water density, or buoyancy), and momentum.

2.2.1. Heat

Heat is transferred between the surface ocean and the atmosphere by the mechanisms of evaporation (latent heat flux), radiation (both direct short-wave sunlight and net long-wave radiation), and conduction (the sensible heat flux). In most cases, the incoming short wave radiation and outgoing evaporative heat dominate. The oceans transport heat from low latitudes to high latitudes, so that in low latitudes, downward heat transport exceeds local upward heat transport. Thus, only in midlatitudes can the heat fluxes be expected to balance locally (Peixoto and Oort, 1992).

The "bulk" formulas for sensible (H) and latent (Lv E) heat fluxes involve drag (transfer) coefficients (CH for latent and CE for evaporative), the wind speed at a height of 10 meters (U10), and the difference in temperature (T, where the subscript "s" denotes water surface, and "a" denotes air) or water saturation (relative humidity, q), respectively (from (Gill, 1982)):

H = [[rho]] aircp CH U10 (Ts - Ta) (8)

and

Lv E = [[rho]]air Lv CE U10 (qs - qa). (9)

The best value for CH ranges from 0.83 * 10-3 (stable atmospheric conditions) to 1.10 * 10-3 (unstable conditions). CE is estimated to be 1.5 * 10-3.

The formulation for the heat flux caused by radiative transfer is somewhat more complicated. The input radiation (QI,0) can be described as a function of latitude and season (Frouin, et al., 1989). Some of the incoming radiation is blocked by clouds in the atmosphere. The effect of clouds represents a major uncertainty in the heat balance of the surface ocean (Seager, et al., 1988, Wigley, 1989, Mitchell, et al., 1989). In addition to oceanic heat gain by incoming light, some heat is lost by outgoing blackbody radiation. There exist several formulations to calculate the net radiative heat flux; the following was presented by (Gill, 1982):

QI = QI,0 (1 - [[alpha]]s) (1 - 0.7nc) (10)

and

QB = 0.985 [[sigma]] Ts4 (0.39 - 0.05 ea1/2) (1 - 0.6nc2), (11)

where QI is the downward radiative heat flux, Qb is the upward long-wave radiation, [[alpha]]s is the surface albedo (roughly 0.3), nc is the fractional cloud cover, [[sigma]] is the Boltzmann constant, Ts is the sea surface temperature, and ea is the vapor pressure of the atmosphere (mbar). The standard deviation of the uncertainty of the total heat flux has been estimated to be on the order of 25 W m-2 (Weare, et al., 1981); see also (Seager, et al., 1988, Davis, et al., 1981). For comparison, the global average heat flux is on the order of 240 W m-2 (Gill, 1982), and the perturbation due to the anthropogenic CO2 will be approximately 4 W m-2 (Lorius, et al., 1991).

2.2.2. Fresh Water

The net flux of fresh water across the air sea interface is determined by the difference between evaporation and precipitation. A bulk formula for the evaporation flux was given above (equation 9). Atlases of precipitation rate are available from (Peixoto and Oort, 1983) and (Baumgartner and Reichel, 1975) but in general the uncertainties are quite large (for example see (Archer, et al., 1993)).

2.2.3. Light

The vertical distribution of photosynthesis is determined by the penetration of light into the upper ocean and by the depth profile of nutrients. Light penetration (as opposed to absorbtion at the surface) may also have an effect on the sea surface temperature (Woods and Barkmann, 1986). Ocean waters have been divided into three optical types (Jerlov, 1976) according to the optical characteristics of their suspended particulate material. In the open ocean, the concentration of suspended detritus is low, and the optical properties are largely regulated by the abundance of phytoplankton chlorophyll. If we treat the light field as has having only two components, then we can approximate the profile of light energy with depth as:

Q(z) = Qblue,I e-k' z (12)

and

k' = .04 + .0088 Chl + .054 Chl2/3 (13)

where Qblue,I is the incidence of blue visible light at the sea surface (roughly half of the total radiative energy), and Chl is the concentration of chlorophyll, and a and b are constants (from (Parsons, et al., 1984)). Only the blue, penetrating fraction of the light is photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). The rest of the light energy (Qred,I) is red light, which is absorbed in the top meter. State-of-the-art models of PAR and light energy input to the mixed layer include such factors as wavelength dependent absorption, latitude, season, and angle of solar input (Sathyendranath and Platt, 1988, Morel, 1988).

2.2.4. Momentum

The wind stress on the ocean surface can be calculated from the square of the wind speed at a height of 10 meters (U10), the density of air ([[rho]]air), and a drag coefficient (CD) (from (Wu, 1982)):

[[tau]] = [[rho]]air CD U102. (14)

The drag coefficient, CD is often represented by a constant. However, the high seas which result from heavy winds tend to increase CD. Values of the drag coefficient as a function of wind speed were summarized by (Wu, 1982):

C10 = 10-3 (0.8 + 0.065 U10) (15)

When this expression is incorporated into (7), the momentum flux into the surface layer scales as the wind speed to the third power. Since the momentum flux is a non-linear function of the wind speed, the use of wind speeds averaged over time scales of weeks to months results in underestimation of wind-driven mixing (for example, see (Rosati and Miyakoda, 1988))

2.3. Mixing Models

Given the inputs of heat, fresh water, and momentum from the atmosphere, a one-dimensional mixed layer model predicts the depth of the mixed layer, and in some models the shape of the mixed layer base, as a function of time. There are three basic families of mixed layer models: the "bulk turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)" models, the "shear instability" models, and the "turbulence closure" models (see (Martin, 1986, Martin, 1985, Niiler and Kraus, 1977)). The assumed physical mechanisms by which entrainment occurs differ fundamentally among the three families, but all are reasonably successful at predicting the observed depth of the mixed layer.

2.3.1. Integrated TKE, or "Bulk", Models

The so-called bulk turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) model, initially formulated by (Kraus and Turner, 1967), treats mixing based on a budget for the integrated TKE of the surface ocean (Figure 4). A fundamental assumption of this model is that the mixed layer is completely homogeneous in the various state variables (T, S, U, V, TKE, solutes, etc.). This assumption appears to be well founded in most parts of the surface ocean (see (Price, et al., 1986, Martin, 1986)). A heat balance is constructed which accounts for exchange with the atmosphere (Lv E and H, equations 8 and 9) and fluxes by radiative transfer (QI, equations 10 and 11), and cooling caused by entrainment of colder water from below (as the mixed layer depth, h, changes with time):

where

[[Lambda]] = 0 if f(dh,dt) < 0

and

Ts is the sea surface temperature, and [[Delta]]T is the temperature difference across the mixed layer base.

The two degrees of freedom in equation 16 are the sea surface temperature and the depth of the mixed layer; another independent equation is necessary to close the system. The requisite constraint is based on a kinetic energy budget. The source of TKE is the wind stress (a scaling coefficient, m, times the "friction velocity" of the wind, U*3) and the sink is dissipation (D). The residual kinetic energy (the difference between input and dissipation) is transformed into potential energy by mechanical mixing of cold water into the mixed layer (also, the average TKE of the mixed layer decreases as quieter water is entrained):

Since (Kraus and Turner, 1967), many other workers have used models based on this formulation, and much of the work has centered on the dissipation of turbulence (see (Stevenson, 1979) for a review). The generation and dissipation of turbulence is the greatest weakness of this type of model; in the case of dissipation in particular, the link between the model and the actual physics is weak. Some authors scale TKE dissipation as a constant loss rate times the mixed layer depth (Kim, 1976, Niiler and Kraus, 1977). Others calculate the dissipation rate as a function of the total amount of mixed-layer TKE, the coriolis parameter (Garwood, 1977) and/or the Monin-Obukhov length scale for turbulence (Gaspar, 1988). To simulate the mixed layer response to hurricanes, (Elsberry, et al., 1976) used a parameterization for dissipation as a fraction of surface input of TKE that increases with increasing mixed layer depth.

The other weakness of the bulk TKE family of models is the generation of TKE (calculated as a constant, m, times the wind stress). The value of m is "tuned" to fit the model predictions to observed data, and the best value for m tends to vary with location and conditions (ranging from 0.1 to 0.39 (Martin, 1985) 0.3 to 0.9 (Price, et al., 1978) 0.4 to 0.5 (Davis, et al., 1981)). The instability of m and the uncertainty about TKE dissipation certainly detract from the predictive ability of the bulk TKE-type model.

2.3.2. Shear Instability Models

Another potential source of TKE, not considered in the original Kraus-Turner formulation, is the generation of turbulence by current shear (Figure 5). Although the only source of energy to the mixed layer is input by wind, in the shear models this energy is assumed to generate mean flow rather than turbulent energy, and the flow is converted to turbulence at the base of the mixed layer (see (Gargett, et al., 1979)).

2.3.2.1. Formulation

Mixing in a stratified fluid is governed by the gradient of velocity with depth (shear) and the density stratification (Ellison and Turner, 1959). The relevant non-dimensional parameter is calculated as the ratio of these quantities (from (Price, et al., 1986)),

and is called the gradient Richardson number.

The Richardson number used in most mixed layer models is defined somewhat differently. The mixed layer is viewed as a slab, with uniform velocity and density. Instead of the differential quantities [[partialdiff]][[rho]]/[[partialdiff]]z and [[partialdiff]]u/[[partialdiff]]z, the differences [[Delta]][[rho]]/h and [[Delta]]u/h are used, where [[Delta]][[rho]] and [[Delta]]u are the changes in density and velocity across the mixed layer base. The length scale is the thickness of the mixed layer, h, rather than a scale associated with the thickness of the mixed layer base. The dimensionless number thus defined,

is called the bulk Richardson number (Pollard, et al., 1973, Price, et al., 1986). In the shear models, mixing is assumed to begin when Rib falls below a critical value, and water is entrained until Rib reaches the critical value once again. Models based on the bulk Richardson number predict mixed layer variations quite well, and the only potentially "tunable" parameter is the critical Richardson number, which appears to be stable throughout a variety of locations and climatic conditions (Price, et al., 1978, Price, et al., 1986). Theoretical justification for use of the bulk, rather than the gradient, Richardson number for these models is still a matter of discussion (Pollard, et al., 1973, Price, et al., 1978).

The shear instability model of (Price, et al., 1986) uses both Rib and Rig to determine mixing (Figure 6). The model was used to simulate detailed diurnal fluctuations in the mixed layer depth and current profiles from the subtropical Pacific. In the model, the heat fluxes (except penetrating solar radiation) and the wind stress are applied to the mixed layer. The bulk Richardson number at the base of the surface box is calculated, and if the shear is greater than the density stratification necessary to support it (Rib < 0.65), then the properties of the two adjacent boxes are averaged (the boxes are mixed). This process continues downward until Rib > 0.65. The mixed layer is considered homogeneous for momentum and density, as it is in the bulk TKE formulations considered above. The density transition at the mixed layer base is smoothed using the gradient Richardson number. If Rig between two adjacent boxes is smaller than a critical value (Rig < 0.25), the adjacent boxes are partially mixed until the shear becomes sub-critical again, and the process is repeated until Rig is greater than or equal to the critical value throughout the water column. Thus, there is a region of partial mixing below the completely mixed zone. The model also includes convective entrainment driven by surface cooling.

2.3.2.2. Behavior

A model in which the generation of turbulence scales with the Richardson number behaves differently from a model which scales turbulence directly with wind stress (Price, et al., 1978). This is largely because of the rotation of an inertial current relative to the surface of the earth (the coriolis effect). In the presence of steady, non-rotating wind forcing, a natural limit is imposed on the current velocity by the "inertial" rotational frequency (the value for which varies as a function of latitude). The advantage of scaling entrainment to the current velocity, as opposed to scaling with the wind stress directly, is that the current velocity is limited by the rotational frequency, and no artificial dissipation term is required to limit the steady-state mixed layer depth. (With constant wind forcing and no dissipation term, a TKE model would entrain forever). As we have seen, the treatment of dissipation is one of the major weaknesses in the TKE model formulation.

Also, the value of the critical Rib required to simulate oceanographic data using a shear instability mixed layer model is fairly constant throughout a range of climatic conditions (Price, et al., 1978, Pollard, et al., 1973, Price, et al., 1986). This can be contrasted with the wind-scaling coefficient used in the TKE model, which must be tuned to simulate data from different locations or climatic regimes.

2.3.3. Turbulence Closure Models

The third family of upper ocean mixing models is the most general, the most complicated, and the most stringently founded in the theoretical and empirical properties of fluid turbulence. These are the "turbulence closure" models, first introduced into the mainstream oceanography literature by (Mellor, 1973) (see also (Mellor and Yamada, 1974, Mellor and Durbin, 1975, Mellor and Yamada, 1982)). Turbulence closure models were originally constructed for use in the atmospheric boundary layer. In the oceans, Mellor's model is general enough to be applied to special cases like the equator, where the equatorial undercurrent produces regions of extremely high shear, and to a system of estuarine circulation, spanning the benthic boundary layer, the highly stratified shear flow between the saline and fresh waters, and the surface boundary layer (Oey, et al., 1985).

2.3.3.1. Formulation

The physical foundation for the turbulence closure models begins with the full Reynold's equations for momentum and heat (from Mellor, 1973):

and

where U is velocity, [[Theta]] is temperature, f is the coriolis parameter, P is pressure, g is the gravitational constant, [[nu]] is the molecular viscosity, [[alpha]] is the thermal diffusivity, and [[beta]] is the thermal expansion coefficient. The equations for the mean flow and temperature can be found by decomposing the total velocity and temperature fields into mean and fluctuating components and averaging:

and

The terms xto(u u) and xto(u [[theta]]) represent the effect of the turbulent fluctuations on the mean velocity and temperature (the Reynold's stress and "eddy diffusion"). Finding analytical expressions for these terms is the problem at the heart of the turbulence closure models.

Derivation of expressions for these terms begins with these two sets of equations, and incorporates several empirical simplifying relationships based on laboratory data (the interested reader is referred to (Mellor, 1973)). The salient point to understand about the derivation is that the solutions contain several empirical constants, which are fit to laboratory data from neutral (unstratified) flows. (Mellor and Yamada, 1982) show the surprising result that the model, using these constants, is also able to predict laboratory data for stratified flow, flow in a pipe, and flow over a curved surface. Some of the terms in the equations also require a constant with units of length to maintain dimensional homogeneity. Mellor assumes that the length scales are all proportional to a single "mixing length scale" (l). This assumption, and the derivation of a number for l, is considered a weak link in the turbulence closure scheme. The choice of l is crucial; the levels 2 and 2.5 models (described below) supply eddy diffusion coefficients that scale directly to l.

The full version of the model is somewhat cumbersome, and some of the terms can be neglected without loss of predictive value. (Mellor and Yamada, 1974) presents a hierarchy of closure schemes which employ increasing levels of simplification, based on the dependence of each term on the degree of anisotrophy (directional inhomogeneity) of the turbulence (the term is called "a", and is typically around 15% for the ocean surface boundary layer). The level 4 model is simplified the least, and is in general too complicated for routine oceanographic use, without any corresponding benefit in predictive value. The level 3 model neglects all terms which clearly scale with a2. There is some uncertainty to this scaling procedure. For the level 3 model the advective and diffusive terms for q2 (a synonym for 2 * TKE) are assumed to scale with a1 and are left in; for the level 2 model, they are assumed to scale with a2 and are neglected. This has the importance consequence in the level 2 model of setting the diffusive flux of TKE equal to zero, so that all turbulence is dissipated locally to its generation (Niiler and Kraus, 1977).

Mellor's model of choice is called the level 2.5 model (Mellor and Yamada, 1982). Level 2.5 starts from the level 3 model but neglects the advection and diffusion of variance of the material terms like temperature and salinity (equations for
xto([[theta]]2) and xto(s2)). The result is the elimination of several differential equations; the savings depends on the number of scalar quantities being modeled (e.g., nutrients, pCO2).

The final, reduced form of the level 2.5 model adds two equations to the averaged equations of motion that would be required to model any geophysical fluid. The first describes the time and space distribution of q2/2, the turbulent kinetic energy. Energy is added at the top as a boundary condition, advects, and diffuses according to the calculated eddy diffusion coefficient. Turbulent energy is generated by shear at the expense of mean flow. The length scale, l, is determined using a second differential equation for the quantity q2l. The result of this formulation is that l, the length scale of the largest eddies, is time dependent, has memory, and is allowed to be transported. The eddy diffusion coefficient at a given time and depth is calculated as a function of q2 and l. Once the diffusion coefficient field is known, it is used for mixing the scalar quantities.

The mixing coefficient predicted by the model turns out to be a function of the local gradient Richardson number (Niiler and Kraus, 1977, Mellor and Durbin, 1975); above Rig = 0.23, no mixing at all is predicted. This is similar to the Price model, in which mixing takes place until a critical Rig > 0.25 is attained. The level 2.5 model has been used in a global ocean model that focuses on the surface ocean and the sea surface temperature (Rosati and Miyakoda, 1988).

2.3.3.2. Behavior

The turbulence closure models are more difficult to understand in an intuitive way than the other models. Insight can be gained by comparing the behavior of the model with those of the bulk TKE and shear models described above.

One obvious distinction is the degree of mixing in the turbulence closure model mixed layer. Whereas the other formulations assume homogeneity of all properties within the mixed layer, the turbulence models predict high but finite mixing coefficients within this zone. Under conditions of deep convective mixing, the "bulk" assumption (that the mixed layer is completely homogeneous in all properties) is probably inadequate, but under conditions of shallower, wind-driven mixing, the "bulk" approximation may be closer to reality than the output of the turbulence models (Martin, 1986).

The fundamental distinction between bulk and shear models presented earlier was the source of the turbulent energy for entrainment: from wind stress directly or from current shear. The main source of entrainment energy in the turbulence closure models is difficult to judge from first principles. For the primary source of turbulence to be generation at the surface, the rate of transport of turbulent energy through the mixed layer must be greater than the rate of generation of turbulence by shear at the mixed layer base. In the level 2 model, transport of turbulence does not occur; all turbulence is dissipated locally. Numerical experiments using levels 2.5 and higher have shown that the transport flux of turbulent energy from the surface zone in these models is also small relative to the generation of turbulence by shear (Klein and Coantic, 1981, Martin, 1986). Thus the turbulence closure models appear to function primarily as shear instability models.

2.3.4. Mixed Layer Model Comparison

All of the models can adequately predict observed fluctuations in the mixed layer depth in the ocean, under most conditions. There may be situations (for example, the equatorial undercurrent, or regions near a western boundary current) which are more complicated than a mid-gyre mixed layer, and these will probably be better handled by the turbulence closure scheme. On the other hand, simplicity and conservation of computer resources may be the priority, in which case a bulk TKE or shear instability model would be the model of choice.

2.3.4.1. The Stability of Empirical Parameters

A criterion for comparison of the model formulations is the quantity and stability of the empirical parameters required for oceanic simulation. The bulk TKE models appear to be weakest in this respect, in that the coefficient which predicts TKE flux into the mixed layer based on the wind stress seems to vary as a function of climatic conditions (see section 5.1.). The empirical parameters used by the shear instability models are the critical Richardson numbers Rib and Rig, which do not vary in this way (Price, et al., 1978). The constants in the turbulence closure models were determined from laboratory experiments, and appear to be adequate for oceanic use (see (Rosati and Miyakoda, 1988)).

2.3.4.2. Accuracy

Detailed comparisons of the ability of each model to simulate oceanic data are presented by (Martin, 1985) and (Martin, 1986). The latter study is an extension of the former, with the inclusion of the (Price, et al., 1986) model and a turbulence closure scheme other than Mellor's (Therry and Lacarrere, 1983). The conclusions are the following. First, the turbulence closure schemes are essentially Richardson number-driven models, and the main differences among them (and the (Price, et al., 1986) model) are the exact value of the critical Richardson number at which mixing commences. Second, the bulk TKE models (as represented by the model of (Garwood, 1977)) do not attempt to simulate partial mixing at the base of the mixed layer, as do the Price model and the turbulence closure schemes. For this reason, the bulk TKE model mixed layer base is unrealistic. Third, the turbulence models predict a greater gradient of momentum and density through the mixed layer than is observed (in the data presented in (Price, et al., 1986) ); apparently, some mechanism for mixing exists (such as langmiur circulation) that is not included in the one-dimensional turbulence closure model formulation. Finally, under some circumstances, each of the models predicts mixed layer depths that deviate somewhat from the observed data.

2.3.4.3. Computational Efficiency

(Martin, 1986) also compares the computation time required by the different types of models. As written, the bulk model (Garwood, 1977) is the fastest. The Price shear-driven model is significantly slower, mainly because of calculations involved in maintenance of the partially mixed zone beneath the mixed layer (based on Rig, explained above), which can be eliminated (Archer, et al., 1993). The turbulence models are the slowest, because of their complexity and the higher temporal and spatial resolution required. Turbulence models are the most suitable for use in a vectorized or parallel computer architecture, which would reduce somewhat the computation load disparity between the model types.

2.4. Physical Transport of Dissolved Nutrients into the Euphotic Zone

In addition to light limitation, photosynthesis in the ocean is limited by the availability of dissolved nutrients, primarily nitrate and phosphate (NO3- and PO43-). Biological production in the surface ocean produces particles which sink into deeper waters, where they ultimately re-dissolve. This process (called the "biological pump") maintains lower concentrations of nutrients (and CO2) in the surface ocean than within the thermocline waters below.

A simple model of nutrient cycling in the upper ocean was presented by (Peng, et al., 1987), to reproduce data from the Greenland sill. The upper box of the model is the mixed layer; the lower box represents the thermocline (Figure 7). The boundary between the boxes fluctuates according to the observed annual cycle of mixed layer depth. Both boxes are well-mixed. Organic carbon is produced in the upper box and regenerated within the lower box. When the mixed layer deepens in the winter, nutrients from the deep box are entrained into the mixed layer. The model neglects the diffusive flux of nutrients across the boundary (either between the two boxes or from the deep ocean into the lower box) and the sinking flux of particles at the bottom boundary. However, the annual cycle of surface water nutrient concentration and the dissolved O2 and CO2 predicted by this simple model are similar to the observations.

When the vertical density structure of the water column and the processes of nutrient transport and regeneration are considered in greater detail, the picture becomes more complex (Figure 8). Although most of the organic matter that falls from the euphotic zone is regenerated in the upper few hundreds of meters of the water column, some fraction (~25% at 200 meters (Martin, et al., 1987)) inevitably escapes from the deepest reach of the mixed layer; it is this fraction that drives respiration in the deep water and benthos. This loss must be balanced by upward diffusion or advection of nutrients.

In the subpolar gyres, the net upwelling driven by the wind stress curl is an obvious mechanism for transporting nutrients to the euphotic zone. In the subtropical gyres, the net vertical velocity is downward, and accounting for the nutrient supply inferred from the sinking carbon flux is more difficult. (Hayward, 1987) documented the problem in detail in the central North Pacific, using data from several California / Hawaii transects and quasi-time series data from a site near Hawaii. The surface nutrient structure in this region is characterized by low nutrient concentrations in the euphotic zone, on top of a "nutricline", or region of nutrient increase with depth. The top of the nutricline is located well below the depth of the seasonal thermocline, and is roughly at the depth of the deepest reach of the mixed layer in winter. No seasonal structure in the nutrient/depth relation was detected in the nutricline data, which would be indicative of entrainment of the nutrient rich thermocline water into the winter mixed layer. Calculation of nutrient mixing rates through the nutricline, based on the paradigm of Fickian eddy mixing, yielded a nutrient supply rate that was an order of magnitude too small to account for the observed production. (This calculation is sensitive to the appropriate value of the eddy mixing coefficient, however, which is not well known.) Perhaps more importantly, Hayward observes that there was no correlation between the nutrient gradient and the productivity rate, as would be predicted by a Fickian eddy mixing model. He concludes that nutrient supply to the euphotic zone must be more complicated than can be explained by the eddy mixing formulation. The nutrient supply problem has also been documented in the subtropical Atlantic near Bermuda (Jenkins, 1987), with the conclusion that the Fickian "background" eddy mixing rate is too slow by an order of magnitude to mix nutrients into the euphotic zone fast enough to meet the observed production demand.

Several potential solutions to the nutrient supply problem have been suggested. (Villareal, et al., 1993) proposed that diatoms in this region may be able to migrate vertically to reach both the deep nutrients and the shallow euphotic zone in the course of a 24-hour cycle). There are also abundant indications that nutrient transport may be an episodic process, rather than a "constant background" eddy diffusive flux. (Jenkins, 1987) observed an anomalous nutrient profile in the subtropical Atlantic that appeared to represent an injection of high nutrient thermocline water into the euphotic zone. The apparent transport of nitrate to the euphotic zone during this event was high enough to supply 20-30% of the annual production demand. Based on a calculated residence time of inorganic nitrate, Jenkins calculates that these episodic events could supply the entire nutrient requirement of the euphotic zone, but the probability of actually observing such an event on any given cast would only be around 1%. Abundant theoretical evidence exists that nutrient transport may be dominated by motions on a frontal and mesoscale in the upper ocean. (Bleck, et al., 1988) constructed a two dimensional isopycnal vertical coordinate numerical model of a convergent front. Using typical open ocean conditions, they calculated local time-averaged vertical velocities associated with fronts of greater than 5 meters day-1. (Pollard and Regier, 1990) deployed a towed undulating CTD and an acoustic doppler current profiler in the subtropical Atlantic and inferred that the mechanisms predicted by (Bleck, et al., 1988) were correct, and that there were vertical velocities of tens of meters per day at that location. Intense fronts are found at the boundaries between water masses (gyres) in the upper ocean; less intense fronts also form during the decay of mesoscale eddies, which are thought to be ubiquitous in the ocean ((Semtner and Chervin, 1992) and references therein). (Strass, 1992) presented towed undulating vehicle data that included a fluorescence sensor for chlorophyll in addition to CTD measurements. He found the highest values of the subsurface chlorophyll concentration on the anticyclonic side of a front, just as predicted. Also, he found that the spatial scale of chlorophyll variability was similar to the Rossby radius of deformation, as predicted by (Woods, 1988). The similarity between the spatial scale of chlorophyll patchiness and the physical scale of eddy dynamics (the mesoscale) lends support to the idea that meso and frontal scale dynamics control the transport of nutrients to the euphotic zone in the subtropical gyre.

We conclude that while macro-nutrient supply (NO3 and PO4) clearly regulates photosynthesis in some pelagic systems, most notably in the subtropical gyres, the mechanisms by which nutrients are supplied to the euphotic zone are still a topic of active research and that an off-the-shelf nutrient transport model is as yet not available. In locations such as the subtropical Pacific, where nutrient supply clearly has a dominant role in determining phytoplankton growth and depth distribution (Hayward, 1987), a simple eddy diffusion formulation must be used, with the understanding that essential characteristics of nutrient transport, and thus their effect on phytoplankton dynamics, may be missing.

Summary

Ecosystem dynamics in the upper ocean are heavily influenced, if not controlled, by the physics of mixing, both in the surface turbulent layer, and between nutrient rich deep waters and the depleted waters within the euphotic zone. We have seen that some aspects of the problem of ocean mixing are well understood, while other aspects of the problem are still murky. In particular, several classes of models exist to describe the dynamics of the surface mixed layer. In contrast, the processes by which nutrients are supplied to the euphotic zone (presumably mixing with nutrient-rich subsurface waters) are not well understood.

Citations

Archer, D. E., S. Emerson, T. Powell, and C. S. Wong. 1993. Numerical prediction of pCO2 at the sea surface at weathership station Papa. Progress in Oceanography 32: 319-351.

Archer, D. E. and E. Maier-Reimer. 1994. Effect of deep-sea sedimentary calcite preservation on atmospheric CO2 concentration. Nature 367: 260-264.

Baumgartner, A. and E. Reichel. 1975. The world water balance: Mean annual global, continental and maritime precipitation, evaporation and run-off. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Holland.

Bleck, R., R. Onken, and J. D. Woods. 1988. A two-dimensional model of mesoscale frontogenesis in the ocean. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meterological Society 114: 347-371.

Broecker, W. S. 1991. Keeping global change honest. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 5: 191-192.

Broecker, W. S. and T. H. Peng. 1982. Tracers in the sea. Eldigio Press, Palisades, NY.

Charlson, R., J. E. Lovelock, M. O. Andreae, and S. G. Warren. 1987. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulfur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326: 655-661.

Clayton, T. D. and R. H. Byrne. 1993. Calibration of m-cresol purple on the total hydrogen ion concentration scale and its application to CO2-system characteristics. Deep-Sea Research 40: 2115-2129.

Davis, R. E., R. deSzoeke, and P. Niiler. 1981. Variability in the upper ocean during MILE. Part I: The heat and momentum balances. Deep Sea Research 28: 1427-1451.

Davis, R. E., R. dsSzoeke, and P. Niiler. 1981. Variability in the upper ocean during MILE. Part II: Modeling the mixed layer response. Deep Sea Research 28: 1453-1475.

Dickson, A. G., and F. J. Millero. 1987. A comparison of the equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media. Deep-Sea Research 34: 1733-1743.

Ellison, T. H., and J. S. Turner. 1959. Turbulent entrainment in stratified flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 6: 423-448.

Elsberry, R. L., T. S. Friam, and R. N. J. Trapnell. 1976. A mixed layer model of the oceanic thermal response to hurricanes. Journal Geophysical Research 81: 1153-1162.

Evans, G. T., and J. S. Parslow. 1985. A model of annual plankton cycles. Biological Oceanography 3: 327-347.

Fenchel, T. 1988. Marine plankton food chains. Annual Review of Ecological Systems 19: 19-38.

Frost, B. W. 1987. Grazing control of phytoplankton stock in the open subarctic Pacific Ocean : a model assessing the role of mesozooplankton, particularly the large calanoid copepod Neocalanus spp. Marine Ecology Progress Series 39: 49-68.

Frouin, R., D. W. Linger, C. Gautier, K. S. Baker, and R. C. Smith. 1989. A simple analytical formula to compute clear sky total and photosynthetically available solar irradiance at the ocean surface. Journal Geophysical Research 94 : 9731-9743.

Gargett, A. E., T. B. Sanford, and T. R. Osborn. 1979. Surface mixing layers in the Sargasso Sea. Journal Physical Oceanography 9: 1090-1111.

Garwood, R. W. 1977. An ocean mixed layer model capable of simulating cyclic states. Journal Physical Oceanography 7: 455-468.

Gaspar, P. 1988. Modeling the seasonal cycle of the upper ocean. Journal Physical Oceanography 18: 161-180.

Gill, A. E. 1982. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics. Acedemic Press, Orlando, Florida.

Hansson, I. 1973. A new set of acidity constants for carbonic acid and boric acid in seawater. Deep-sea Research 20: 461-478.

Hayward, T. L. 1987. The nutrient distribution and primary production in the central North Pacific. Deep-sea Research 34: 1593-1627.

Holm-Hansen, O, E.W. Helbling, and D. Lubin. 1993. Ultraviolet radiation in Antarctica: inhibtion of primary production. Photochemistry and Photobiology 58: 567-571.

Jenkins, W. J. 1987. The use of anthropogenic tritium and helium-3 to study subtropical gyre ventilation and circulation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Soceity of London 325: 43-61.

Jerlov, N. G. 1976. Marine Optics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Johansson, O., and M. Wedborg. 1982. On the evaluation of potentiometric titrations of seawater with hydrochloric acid. Oceanologica Acta 5: 209-218.

Johnson, K.M., A.E. King, and J. Sieburth. 1985. Coulometric [[Sigma]]CO2 analyses for marine studies: an introduction. Marine Chemistry 16: 61-82.

Keller, M. D., W. K. Bellows, and R. R. L. Guillard. 1989. A survey of DMS production in twelve classes of marine phytoplankton, pages 167-182in Saltzman, E. and W. Cooper, editors. Biogenic sulfur in the Environment. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.

Kim, J.-W. 1976. A generalized bulk model of the oceanic mixed layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography 6: 686-695

Klein, P. and M. Coantic. 1981. A numerical study of turbulent processes in the marine upper layers. Journal of Physical Oceanography 11: 849-863.

Knox, F. and M. McElroy. 1984. Change in atmospheric CO2: Influence of the marine biota at high latitude. Journal of Geophysical Research 89: 4629-4637.

Kraus, E. B. and J. S. Turner. 1967. A one-dimensional model of the seasonal thermocline II. The general theory and its consequences. Tellus 19: 98-105.

Lisitzin, A. P. 1967. Basic relationships in distribution of modern siliceous sediments and their connection with climatic zonation. International Geology Review 9: 631-652, 842-863, 1114-1130.

Lorius, C., J. Jouzel, D. Raynaud, J. Hansen, and H. L. Treut. 1991. The ice-core record: climate sensitivity and future greenhouse warming. Nature 347: 139-145.

Martin, J. H. and R. M. Gordon. 1988. Northeast Pacific iron distributions in relation to phytoplankton productivity. Deep-sea Research 35: 177-196.

Martin, J. H., G. A. Knauer, D. M. Karl, and W. M. Broenkow. 1987. VERTEX: carbon cycling in the northeast Pacific. Deep Sea Research 34: 267-285.

Martin, P. J. 1985. Simulation of the mixed layer at OWS November and Papa with several models. Journal of Geophysical Research 90: 903-916.

Martin, P. J. 1986. Testing and comparison of several mixed-layer models. Naval Ocean Research and Development Activity. Technical Report Number 143.

Mehrbach, C., C. Culberson, J. E. Hawley, and R. M. Pytkowicz. 1973. Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnology and Oceanography 18: 897-907.

Mellor, G. L. 1973. Analytic prediction of the properties of stratified planetary surface layers. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 30: 1061-1069.

Mellor, G. L. and P. A. Durbin. 1975. The structure and dynamics of the ocean surface mixed layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography 5: 718-728.

Mellor, G. L. and T. Yamada. 1974. A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 31: 1791-1806.

Mellor, G. L. and T. Yamada. 1982. Development of a turbulence clusure model for geophysical fluid problems. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics 20: 851-875.

Miller, C. B., B. W. Frost, P. A. Wheeler, M. R. Landry, N. Welschmeyer, and T. M. Powell. 1991. Ecological dynamics in the subarctic Pacific, a possibly iron-limited ecosystem. Limnology and Oceanography 36: 1600-1615.

Millero, F. J., R. H. Byrne, R. Wanninkhof, R. Feely, T. Clayton, P. Murphy and M. Lamb. 1993. The internal consistency of CO2 measurements in the equatorial Pacific. Marine Chemistry 44: 269-280.

Mitchell, J. F. B., C. A. Senior, and J. W. Ingram. 1989. CO2 and climate: a missing feedback? Nature, 341: 132-134.

Morel, A. 1988. Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its biogenous matter content (Case I waters). Journal of Geophysical Research, 93 : 10749-68.

Morel, F. M. M., J. G. Reuter, and N. M. Price. 1991. Iron nutrition of phytoplankton. Oceanography 4: 71-78.

Niiler, P. P. and E. B. Kraus. 1977. One-dimensional models of the upper ocean, pages 143-172 in Kraus, E.B. editor, Modelling and Prediction of the Upper Layers of the Ocean. Pergammon Press, Oxford, U.K.

Oey, L.-Y., G. L. Mellor and R. I. Hires. 1985. A three-dimensional simulation of the Hudson-Raritan estuary. Part I: description of the model and model simulations. Journal of Physical Oceanography 15: 1676-1692.

Owens, N. J. P., J. N. Galloway, and R. A. Duce. 1992. Episodic atmospheric nitrogen deposition to oligotrophic oceans. Nature 357: 397-399.

Parsons, T. R., M. Takahashi, and B. Hargrave. 1984. Biological Oceanographic Processes. Pergammon Press, Oxford, U.K.

Peixoto, J. P. and A. H. Oort. 1983. The atmospheric branch of the hydrological cycle and climate, in al., A. S.-P. e. Variations of the global water budget. Reidel, London, U.K.

Peixoto, J. P. and A. H. Oort. 1992. Physics of Climate. 520 Pages. American Institute of Physics, New York.

Peng, T.-H., T. Takahashi, W. S. Broecker, and J. Olafsson. 1987. Seasonal variability of carbon dioxide, nutrients, and oxygen in the northern North Atlantic surface water: Observations and a model. Tellus 39B: 439-458.

Pollard, R. T. and L. Regier. 1990. Large variations in potential vorticity at small spatial scales in the upper ocean. Nature 348: 227-229.

Pollard, R. T., P. B. Rhines, and R. O. R. Y. Thompson. 1973. The deepening of the wind-mixed layer. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics 3: 381-404.

Price, J. F., C. N. K. Mooers, and L. Van. 1978. Observations and simulation of storm-induced mixed-layer deepening. Journal of Physical Oceanography 8: 582-599.

Price, J. F., R. A. Weller. and R. Pinkle. 1986. Diurnal cycling: observations and models of the upper ocean response to diurnal heating, cooling and wind mixing. Journal of Geophysical Research 91: 8411-8427.

Redfield, A. C. 1934. On the proportions of organic derivatives in sea water and their relation to the composition of plankton, in James Johnson Memroial Vol. Liverpool, U.K.

Reuter, J. G. and D. R. Ades. 1987. The role of iron nutrition in photosynthesis and nitrogen assimilation in Scendesmus Quadricuada (Chlorophyceae). Journal of Phycology 23: 452-457.

Riebesell, U., D. A. Wolf-Gladrow, and V. Smetacek. 1993. Carbon dioxide limitation of marine phytoplankton growth rates. Nature 361: 249-251.

Rosati, A. and K. Miyakoda. 1988. A general circulation model for upper ocean simulation. Journal of Physical Oceanography 18: 1601-1626.

Roy, R. N., L. N. Roy, K. M. Vogel, C. Porter-Moore, T. Pearson, C. E. Goode, W. Davis, F. J. Millero, and D. M. Campbell. 1993. The dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at salinities 5 to 45 and temperatures 0 to 45o C. Marine Chemistry 44: 249-267.

Ryther, J. H. 1969. Photosynthesis and fish production in the sea. Science 166: 72-76.

Sarmiento, J. L. and R. Toggweiler. 1984. A new model for the role of the oceans in determining atmospheric pCO2. Nature 308: 621-624.

Sathyendranath, S. and T. Platt. 1988. The spectral irradiance field at the surface and in the interior of the ocean: a model for applications in oceanography and remote sensing. Journal of Geophysical Research 93: 9207-9280.

Seager, R., S. E. Zebiak, and M. A. Cane. 1988. A model of the tropical pacific sea surface temperature climatoloty. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93: 1265-1280.

Semtner, A. J. and R. M. Chervin. 1992. Ocean general circulation from a global eddy-resolving model. Journal of Geophysical Research 97: 5493-5551.

Siegenthaler, U. and T. Wenk. 1984. Rapid atmospheric CO2 variations and ocean circulation. Nature 308: 624-626

Smith, R.C., B.B. Prezelin, K.S. Baker, R.R. Bidigare, N.P. Boucher, T. Coley, D. Karentz, S. MacIntyre, H.A. Matlich, D. Menzies, M. Ondrusek, and Z. Wan. 1992. Ozone depletion: Ultraviolet radiation and phytoplankton biology in Antarctic waters. Science 255: 952-959.

Stevenson, J. W. 1979. On the effect of dissipation on seasonal thermocline models. Journal of Physical Oceanography 9: 57-64.

Strass, V. H. 1992. Chlorophyll patchiness caused by mesoscale upwelling at fronts. Deep-sea Research 39: 75-96.

Stumm, W. and J. J. Morgan. 1981. Aquatic Chemistry. Wiley, New York.

Sverdrup, H. U. 1953. On conditions for the vernal blooming of phytoplankton. J. Cons. Explor. Mer. 18: 287-295.

Takahashi, T., W. S. Broecker, A. E. Bainbridge, and R. F. Weiss. 1980. Carbonate chemistry of the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans: The results of the GEOSECS expeditions, 1972-1978. National Science Foundation, Washington D.C.

Takahashi, T., W. S. Broecker ,and S. Langer. 1985. Redfield ratio based on chemical data from isopycnal surfaces. J. Geophys. Research 90: 6907-6924.

Takahashi, T., D. Chipman, N. Schechtman, J. Goddard, and R. Wannikof. 1982. Measurements of the partial pressure of CO2 in discreet water samples during the North Atlantic Expedition, the Transient Tracers of Oceans Project. Technical Report to NSF. Lamont-Doherty Geological Observatory, Palisades, NY.

Takahashi, T., J. Olafsson, J. G. Goddard, D. W. Chipman, and S. C. Sutherland. 1993. Seasonal variation of CO2 and Nutrients in the high-latitude surface oceans: a comparative study. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 7: 843-878.

Therry, G. and P. Lacarrere. 1983. Improving the eddy kinetic energy model for planteary boundary layer description. Boundary-Layer Meteorology 25: 63-88.

Villareal, T. A., M. A. Altabet, and K. Culver-Rymsza. 1993. Nitrogen transport by vertically migrating diatom mats in the North Pacific Ocean. Nature 363: 709-712.

Weare, B. C., P. T. Strub, and M. D. Samuel. 1981. Annual mean surface heat fluxes in the tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography 11: 705-717.

Weiss, R. 1974. Carbon dioxide in water and seawater. The solubility of a non-ideal gas. Marine Chemistry 2: 203-215.

Wigley, T. M. L. 1989. Possible climate change due to SO2-derived cloud condensation nuclei. Nature 339: 365-367.

Woods, J. 1988. Mesoscale upwelling and primary production, pages 7-38 in Rothschild, B. J., editor, Toward a theory on biological-physical interactions in the world ocean. Kluwer, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Woods, J. D. and W. Barkmann. 1986. The response of the upper ocean to solar heating. I: The mixed layer. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 112: 1-42.

Wu, J. 1982. Wind-stress coeffecients over sea surface from breeze to hurricane. Journal of Geophysical Research 87: 9704-9706.

Box

(A) Values of K'0, K'1, and K'2, and K'B. T is temperature in Kelvins, S is salinity in o/oo.

The equilibrium constant for the process

CO2(g) = H2CO3*(aq)

is given by (Weiss, 1974) as

ln K'0 = 93.4517 (100/T) - 60.2409 + 23.3585 ln (T/100) +
S { 0.0023517 - 0.023656 (T/100) + 0.0047036 (T/100)2}

For the dissociation of carbonic acid, (Dickson and Millero, 1987) give

K'1 = 10 ** {-(6320.18/T - 126.3405 + 19.568 ln T +
( 19.894 - 840.39/T - 3.0189 ln T) S(0.5) + 0.00679S ) }

and

K'2 = 10 ** { -(5143.69/T - 90.1833 + 14.613 ln T +
( 17.176 - 690.59/T - 2.6719 ln T) S(0.5) + .02169 S ) }

For boric acid, (Johansson and Wedborg, 1982) give

K'B = 10**{ -(1030.5/T + 5.5076 - 0.015469S
+ 1.5339.10-4 S2) }

where the total borate concentration of seawater can be estimated to be

[[Sigma]]B = 4.106 .10-4 S / 35.

(B) Method of calculation of carbonate system parameters given values of alkalinity, [[Sigma]]CO2, and salinity, from (Takahashi, et al., 1980).

TALK = total alkalinity, 10-6 eq kg-1

[[Sigma]]CO2 and [[Sigma]]B in 10-6 mol kg-1

C1 = K'1/2.0

C2 = 1.0 - 4.0*K'2/K'1

C4 = [[Sigma]]B * K'B

AHT = 0.7E-8

DO ICNT = 1, 100

A = TALK - C4/(K'B + AHT)

X = A / TCO2

AH1 = C1 / X * (1.0 - X + SQRT( 1.0 + C2 * X * (-2.+X)))

IF(0.5E-4 .GE. ABS(1. - AHT-AH1)) EXIT

AHT = AH1

ENDDO

pCO2 = A * (AH1/K'1) / (K'0 * (1.0+2.0*K'2/AH1))