GEOS 26400/36400/BIOS 23255/EVOL 32300: Principles of Paleontology Systematics, I I. Populations and species -variation as raw material for evolution (heritable change) **evolution as heritable change in trait frequency in pop'n. **ev'n as sorting of heritable variation -importance of scaling changes in mean trait value to variation -evolutionary change expected to be proportional to variance -variation affects statistical confidence that change exceeds chance expectation -heritable (genetic) versus environmental or ecophenotypic variation **All traits have both heritable and environmental basis. **Heritability assessed statistically from parent-offspring resemblance. **Heritability of variation in trait, not of trait -natural selection and genetic drift -Biological Species Concept (BSC) -array of populations that are actually or potentially interbreeding under natural conditions -reproductive cohesion within species and isolation from other species -difficulties applying this concept in practice -ability to interbreed difficult to verify -hybridization, asexual reproduction, horizontal transfer -practical use of morphological species (morphospecies) -Alternatives to BSC include: -Evolutionary Species Concept (species as continuous lineages) -Phylogenetic Species Concept (species as smallest diagnosable monophyletic units) **Species definition vs. species recognition II. Morphological and paleontological species -Try to establish fossil species with morphological differences comparable to the differences among living species. -Problems -Time-averaging inflates variance of sampled population -Hunt study suggests this may be of minimal importance in practice -Fossil populations not systematically more variable than living ones -Variance barely increases, on average, with scale of time-averaging -Implication of Hunt study: predominance of stasis (little net evolutionary change) within spp. -Continuum of form may be oversplit because of emphasis on extremes (Kummel and Steele ammonoid study). -ecophenotypic variation -polymorphic species -cryptic species (behavioral or ecological differences without morphological differences) -Jackson and Cheetham bryozoan studies demonstrate congruence between morphological and genetic species. -morphologically defined species are discrete (greater variation between- than within-species) -variation is heritable (offspring more similar to their own mothers than to other individuals) -implication: ecophenotypy not a dominant source of variation -all morphologically defined species have diagnostic genetic differences -implication: differences probably not mere polymorphisms -no diagnostic genetic differences between different populations of the same species -implication: populations are not cryptic species -magnitude of genetic difference correlated with magnitude of morphologic and cladistic distance -other studies yield similar results, but with an asymmetry: *If there are morphological differences, there are usually corresponding genetic differences. -many "classic" cases thought to reflect ecophenotypic differences now seen as genetic *But if there are no discernible morphological differences, there are sometimes genetic differences nonetheless. *I.e., polymorphic species not much of a problem, but cryptic species may be. *Implications for studying evolution in the fossil record -(more on this when we cover punctuated equilibrium later...) III. Speciation -sympatric vs. allopatric populations -attainment of reproductive isolation within population -allopatric speciation as a three-stage process: -subpopulation formation -subpopulation persistence -failed speciation may reflect extinction of isolated subpopulation -subpopulation divergence -importance of allopatry for speciation -reduced gene flow -heterogeneous selection pressures (different environments) -examples of sympatric speciation -polyploidy (chromosome multiplication), especially in plants -host shifts